Cost Comparison
Feature Detail
Description
The Cost Comparison widget presents a side-by-side view of the estimated cost of running peer mentor reporting manually (spreadsheets, Word forms, coordinator overhead) versus using Meander. Prospective organizations enter their organization size and the widget renders a structured comparison table or visual breakdown showing current cost, Meander subscription cost, and net saving. All data is static and formula-driven - no backend required. The widget targets the finance and procurement stakeholder who may not attend a product demo but reviews the website independently before approving a pilot budget. Clear, scannable cost figures make it easy to forward the page or copy the numbers into an internal briefing. The comparison must present Meander's cost model honestly, including any per-organization or per-user pricing tier that Norse Digital Products publishes. Like the Impact Calculator, this component lives entirely within the static Sales Website build. It may share the same input controls as the Impact Calculator to allow a single-page combined view, or be presented as a separate section depending on UX decisions made during Sales Website design.
Sources & reasoning
The blueprint marks this feature [MVP]. The Vipps cost-sharing passage confirms that pricing transparency is an active concern for prospective tenant organizations, making a cost comparison widget a natural sales-site tool. The MVP scope for the Sales Website calls out "fordeler" (benefits/advantages) as a core concern, and cost-versus-benefit framing is the logical complement to the Impact Calculator on the same page. Dependency on impact-calculator reflects the likely shared input controls bet
No source references — this artifact was included based on reasoning alone (see above).
Analysis
Multi-tenant non-profit platforms face procurement committees that evaluate cost before functionality. A cost comparison that converts "we save coordinator time" into a concrete euro or NOK figure is the final step that moves a skeptical finance lead from interested to approved. For organizations that share Vipps login costs (explicitly called out in the source doc) and split platform fees, a transparent comparison also establishes trust early in the relationship. Combining cost comparison with the impact calculator on the same Sales Website page creates a complete business case in a single visit - reducing the number of touchpoints needed before a demo request. This directly supports Norse Digital Products' goal of shortening the sales cycle and scaling tenant acquisition without proportional growth in sales headcount.
The widget is a static React or Svelte component (matching whatever framework the Sales Website uses) with no server-side logic. Pricing tiers and cost assumptions are authored in a single configuration object so Norse can update them without touching component code. The comparison layout uses a simple two-column table or card pair; avoid complex charting libraries to keep bundle size minimal. If the Sales Website is built with Next.js static export, the component can share input state with the Impact Calculator via URL query parameters, enabling deep links to a pre-filled comparison. All interactive elements must be keyboard accessible and screen-reader friendly per WCAG 2.2 AA. Pricing data shown must be reviewed and signed off by Norse Digital Products before each deployment to prevent stale figures reaching prospects.
Components (46)
Shared Components
These components are reused across multiple features
Service Layer (11)
Data Layer (23)
Infrastructure (7)
User Stories
No user stories have been generated for this feature yet.